Peanut farmers back in business

Aflatoxin contaminated groundnuts

One year, groundnut farmers in sub-Saharan Africa were enjoying harvests and exports that allowed them to feed and educate their children, and the next, the door to the international market was slammed shut. The culprit? Aflatoxin.

Aflatoxins are potent toxins that are produced by certain types of fungi. Naturally occurring and potentially deadly, they infest crops such as groundnuts (peanuts), sorghum, cassava and maize. When ingested, aflatoxins can result in disease anywhere in the body, but are most commonly known for causing acute or chronic liver disease and liver cancer. More than five billion people in the developing world are exposed to aflatoxins by unknowingly consuming contaminated foods.

Although countries across sub-Saharan Africa had been adhering to international aflatoxin safety standards for years, successfully exporting a wide variety of crops, increasingly stringent food safety standards in western countries pushed many smallholder farmers out of the market – the new testing that was demanded of them was just too expensive. Fears grew that the new standards could cost African countries US$670 million in lost groundnut exports.

Aflatoxin detection kits

Mchinji National Smallholders Farmers’ Association of Malawi (MASFAM), one of the farmer co-operatives under the umbrella of the National Small Farmers Association of Malawi  (NASFAM), is just one group of farmers that was shut out of the groundnut export trade due to European Union trade aflatoxin regulations. But they have now come full circle. A new low-cost detection kit developed by the International Agriculture research Center for Semi-Arid Tropics  (ICRISAT) has revitalized their business.

The kit has cut the cost of testing crops from US$25 to US$1 per sample, and has re-opened the doors to export. The simple kit can even be used by the most remote farmers to monitor grains and nuts for the presence of the toxin. In addition, ICRISAT has trained farmers in improved storage techniques to avoid contamination.

More than 4,000 MASFAM farmers are again exporting high-quality groundnuts to Europe under a fair trade agreement. Moses Siambi, an ICRISAT scientist based in Lilongwe, Malawi’s capital, is delighted. “We’ve seen a very positive impact,” he said. “Malawian groundnuts are now available in the biggest supermarkets in Britain.”

“According to Dr Farid Waliyar, ICRISAT West and Central African Director, ICRISAT is now transferring the Malawi experience to many other African countries. “We have also developed solutions to minimize aflatoxin contamination pre-and post-harvest and we are seeking financial support to help scale-up these technologies,” he said.

NASFAM has successfully used the new aflatoxin detection kit as part of a broader effort to re-establish its European export market —and many small farmer co-operatives across the continent could soon be following suit.

Read an in-depth Scidev report: Purging Malawi’s peanuts of deadly aflatoxin

Photo credit: IITA

A “heart” talk with Frank Rijsberman, the new CGIAR Consortium CEO

We are catching Dr Frank Rijsberman, the new CEO of the CGIAR Consortium, on the eve of his “first day on the job”. We won’t give anyone a hard time before they start their new position. So today, we’ll have a “heart” talk, curious as we are to know Frank’s intentions. But… we also agree to have a “hard” talk, within three months, to take stock of progress made.

Q: Frank, welcome! The start of a new beginning! Excited?

Frank:  Excited?! I can’t quite tell you just how excited I am to formally start my new role as CEO of the CGIAR Consortium tomorrow. The past two months have been pretty intense already, preparing for my first day. I already had many meetings with key CGIAR people, the Board Chair, and other Board members, and my staff in the CGIAR Consortium office.  I had a lot to catch up with, since I left CGIAR five years ago. And I am sure there are still going to be moments where I will discover new things.  But, the past months have given me a good appreciation of both the impressive progress made and the challenges down the road.

Q: So you are familiar with the “old” CGIAR…..

Frank: Yes, from 2000-2007, I was Director General of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) one of the 15 centers members of the CGIAR Consortium. In 2007, I left Sri Lanka to join the start-up management team of Google.org, the philanthropic arm of Google where I was Director Program. I led grant making in the public health initiative and was responsible for programs and partnerships in health, disaster response, geo-informatics and climate change adaptation. In 2010 I was appointed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as their first Director Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. I became responsible for ramping up grant making for this new strategy focused on sanitation that works for the poor and led the development of a science and technology initiative. I left the Gates Foundation to re-join CGIAR.

Q: Comparing the “old” CGIAR, when you left, to the “new” CGIAR of today, what is, according to you, the progress CGIAR made in the past years?

Frank:  The big change relates to the CGIAR reform process.  Progress, which, in my assessment,  is quite impressive indeed. If anybody had told me in 2007 that the fifteen CGIAR research centers would sign up to the new constitution, vote in a Consortium Board, set up a new, single, international organization and develop a combined portfolio of CGIAR Research Programs – and that the investors/donors would establish a single Fund with a Fund Council, sign up to a Joint Agreement, and commit rapidly increasing funding to this new system – with an incredible growth rate projected by the centers of 30% to over $900M in 2012 – I would not have believed it. So bravo to all in the CGIAR system!

Q: This is the good, but what are the challenges you see ahead?

Frank: While I can see clearly how much progress has been made, it is not quite cemented and not all promises of the reform have paid off yet. The final steps can be just as hard as the first couple, and are critical to reaping the benefits of the reform. I hear very often that deep down in the trenches a lot of front line workers, from researchers to back office staff to Center Board members, still don’t quite know, or believe, that the reform is for real.  I have a pretty good sense of what the priorities are that have landed on my plate today.

Q: What would those priorities be, and what would be your role in that?

Frank: First, I aim to build strong relationships with key stakeholders inside the CGIAR system as well as with key partners. This is a top priority I have started to work on pretty much from the day I was appointed, now a few months ago, and I aim to keep it at the top of my list. The Consortium Board Chair and I have started to develop a solid working relationship. I spent several days working with the Board Chair, and several of the Board members, last week. The Board Chair has approved my goals and work program for 2012, and we came to agreement on our respective roles and an effective governance-management interface for the Consortium.

This year I plan to visit at least six centers, possibly more, starting with CIMMYT, right after the Agriculture and Rural Development Day we are organizing  during Rio+20  – and I would aim to visit most if not all other centers in 2013. Some I will visit with the Board Chair – AfricaRice and IITA in July. I would also like to visit as many key partners as feasible, starting with EMBRAPA in Brasilia. Finally, I will contribute to resource mobilization, working closely with the Fund Office and the Board Chair, starting with a visit to  the Netherlands next week and followed by a visit to Australia to join the Crawford Fund’s Parliamentary Conference later in the year, just as an example. Jonathan Wadsworth of the Fund Office and I have started to plan for joint work on strategic resource mobilization.

Q: You are also heading the Consortium Office, what do you see as your priorities there?

Frank: I see “building a strong Consortium Office” as another priority for me. We have to get clear targets on products and services we will provide, and agreed service levels, as soon as possible.  We have also restarted, or will soon start, the recruitment for a number of the key positions. It will be another 6 months or so until we have a complete Consortium Office leadership team in place, but I am committed to developing an effective, solid leadership and management team as soon as reasonably feasible.

Q: You said to highly value the CGIAR reform process. What is your role in that?

Frank: Indeed. I would say “The Last, but not the Least” of my top three priorities! I have thought long and hard, and consulted quite widely, on what would be absolutely critical to make the reform work for all concerned — member centers, investors and partners — over the next year or two. That would be the last mile, the final inch – the capstone for the reform. My vision for what it will take, builds on all the work done by CGIAR over the last several years and includes a number of elements already ongoing. I added a few elements into what I would like to refer to as a Performance Management System for the CGIAR.

Q: A “Performance Management System” for CGIAR. What would that consist of?

Frank: There are basically four elements in that. We need quantitative outcome targets for the four System Level Outcomes (SLOs). Linked to that would be quantitative – or as quantitative as reasonably possible – CGIAR Research Program (CRP) outcome metrics: a limited number of meaningful intermediate outcomes that are proxies for impact that track the contributions of each CRP to the System Level Outcomes.

Combining the SLO and CRP targets in a single table would yield a single CGIAR score card, at top level, which can be cascaded down with more detail at CRP, sub-component and theme level etc.

And that, will then contribute to harmonized CRP progress and financial reporting that enables verification of progress and assessment of value for money against agreed targets.

Q: That seems like “easier said than done”!

Frank: Yes, to realize such a performance management system will require the good will and solid efforts of pretty much all stakeholders – just like the rest of the reform. It will be challenging, but I believe quite possible, and even more so, it is in fact: necessary. If all goes well, I would aim to have the key “design” elements of such a system on the table for discussion and hopefully approval in October. Implementation will take most of 2013. It is important work that will require a lot of consultation – and a gradual, pragmatic, and iterative approach.

Q: Such a Performance Management System is, of course, “a tool”. What do you see as “the goal”, and overall, what do you see as your key mission?

Frank: As Kenneth Cassman, the chair of the Independent Science and Partnership Council, reminded me eloquently over dinner last week “producing enough food without destroying the environment is the greatest challenge facing humanity in coming decades”. That is what drives and motivates me – and I feel truly privileged to have been given the opportunity to contribute to that mission. Within that mission, our reform process is critical. I am committed to helping make the reform a success and I am committed to doing that in a way that calls in everyone to contribute.

Q: I am sure I speak in the name of many, in wishing you success with your new position as the CEO of the CGIAR Consortium. We will meet again in three months, for our hard talk. Best of luck!

Frank: Thank you, and looking forward to working with many of you!

 
Read also Frank Rijsberman’s interviews:
in Reuters: Agricultural research funds escape austerity cuts (also in AlertNet)
in VOA News: Making Farming Better in Developing Countries (also in Vietnamese)
in Noticias Agricolas: Seca nos EUA pode impulsionar forte alta dos alimentos, diz instituto internacional (Also in Expresso MT)
in Turkish Weekly: Making Farming Better in Developing Countries
in Igihe: Food Security: Farm Smarter Not to Plow More Land (also in iRwanda)
in Portal do Agronegocio : Seca nos EUA pode provocar alta dos alimentos, diz entidade

 

CGIAR calls for action at Rio+20

 
All CGIAR centers and research programs call for action at Rio+20
Agriculture is the single largest employer in the world, providing livelihoods and jobs for 40 per cent of today’s global population. Moreover, as a human enterprise, it reflects the single largest use of land of any sector. In developing countries, smallholder farms provide up to 80 per cent of the food supply. Faced with environmental degradation, climate change, scarcity of land and water, loss of agricultural biodiversity and ecosystem services, and a world population that is continuing to climb, it is critical for farm and natural resource management and policies to play a more central role in shaping the broader development and environmental agendas.

CGIAR calls for a focus on the entire agricultural landscape as an integrated system, which recognizes that isolated solutions will not reduce risks or achieve required progress in the same way as integrated approaches will.

CGIAR calls for a focus on harmonizing food security and environmental sustainability through agricultural research and development.  This will require us to minimize the harmful effects of agriculture on the environment through more efficient management of water, soils and agricultural inputs.

CGIAR calls for the sustainable management of complex agricultural systems while maximizing agricultural productivity and improving the livelihoods and food/nutrition security of the poor.

To achieve these objectives at Rio+20 and beyond, CGIAR, the world’s largest publicly-funded global research partnership that advances science to reduce global poverty and hunger by addressing issues related to climate change, farming, forestry, environment and natural resources management, among others, has outlined a seven-point plan for how agricultural research for development can contribute to a more sustainable, food-secure future:

  1. We call on Rio+20 actors to adopt cross-sectoral approaches which facilitate broader partnerships, coordinated regulatory frameworks and appropriate economic incentives. What is required now is the vision and courage to transcend conventional sectoral approaches and apply integrated thinking to the management of agriculture, aquaculture, livestock, forests and water.

  2. We urge Rio+20 actors to address the unequal sharing of natural resources and their benefits through improved governance and technology dissemination. Robust land rights, more sustainable management and use of agricultural biodiversity, appropriate inclusive decision-making, benefit-sharing from forest goods and services, and enhanced enforcement by forest agencies, when appropriate, can all contribute to reduced conversion of forests and grasslands and more sustainable management of natural resources.

  3. We prompt Rio+20 actors to support knowledge sharing systems that engage with smallholder farmers to improve the management of their crops, livestock and natural resources in order to increase production as well as minimize negative environmental impacts.

  4. We insist that Rio+20 actors support the wide range of options currently available to restore and better manage degraded environments and ecosystems. Efforts need to focus on scaling out these options and encouraging the adoption through community-designed programs.

  5. We urge Rio+20 actors to strengthen and support local food production groups, livestock herders and smallholder farmers by investing in  agricultural research, strengthening land and water rights, increasing access to markets, finance and insurance, and enhancing local capacity, especially with regard to the use of local agricultural biodiversity.

  6. We request Rio+20 actors to endorse the full implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), which promotes not only the conservation and use of agricultural biodiversity but also the equitable sharing of any benefits that may arise from its use.

  7. We call on Rio+20 actors to make a clear commitment to sustainable agricultural systems that prioritize food and nutrition security in order to lessen the need for emergency responses, thus reducing the human toll of disasters and freeing funds, normally dedicated to disaster relief, to be used for preventive research.

In particular we call on:

  • Government decision-makers to promote increased and sustained investment in agricultural research. CGIAR and its partners work with national and regional research institution agendas to ensure they are meeting local development targets.

  • Farm, land and livestock managers to develop, test and adopt new approaches to land and ecosystem management. The work of CGIAR contributes to providing tools, technologies and approaches in support of a more integrated management of land, forests and water resources.

  • Civil Society Organizations to support partnerships with research agencies at local and national level to ensure development initiatives are using appropriate technologies and approaches. CGIAR provides a range of proven technical solutions and approaches that are socially, economically and environmentally appropriate.

  • Private Sector to support the discovery and dissemination of technologies, tools and knowledge needed by poor farmers and herders. Partnerships between the private sector and public research bodies, such as CGIAR, can play a key role in driving and disseminating agricultural innovation.

Read more about CGIAR at Rio+20
Register for the Agriculture and Rural Development Day at Rio+20
 

FAO and ICARDA link research and development

“New approaches linking research and development
are critical to make research work better
for people in the world’s dry areas”

‘FAO-ICARDA Day’ at the FAO Regional Conference for the Near East

 

Development and research actors must give more critical attention to providing solutions to the smallholder agriculture problems. This is particularly true for the challenges faced by many of the 2.5 billion people living in the world’s dry areas, which comprise 40% of the earth’s surface. A range of practical solutions exist today, created by agricultural research partners.  But these options still remain out of reach to many people living in the dry areas.

To move research into use on a large scale, and improve the lives of many more smallholder farmers, new approaches to research and partnership are required. Approaches and strategies were discussed at a special meeting of FAO (The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation) and ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas), – with country representatives at the FAO Regional Conference for the Near East on May 16. (Details).

At the session, FAO leaders in research, knowledge management and plant protection consulted with ICARDA management and representatives of FAO’s Near East member countries. They reviewed  directions  that the two organizations can take  to improve the uptake of agricultural research innovations for rural communities and smallholders.

Adding value to agricultural extension: civil society and the private sector
Country representatives called on FAO and ICARDA to strengthen their collaboration to link research to development action on the ground in countries. This can be done, they said, taking a broader view of extension that will increase technology and knowledge transfer to farmers and pastoralists. This approach to extension   provides rural advisory services, and involves civil society organizations and  private sector actors to more effectively translate research into practical innovations that farmers can use.

Countries also requested support for capacity development and to facilitate access to innovative technologies and practices that are affordable to smallholders in the region. This support is considered essential to better address the current and future challenges in agriculture and food security in the region (see conference report).

A key element discussed was the work in progress by FAO to prepare a ‘roadmap’  to engage with the CGIAR Consortium Board and Centres on a more strategic and long- term basis.

The need for greater collaboration between countries, international bodies such as FAO and the international research network of the CGIAR has never been more important, said Laurent Thomas, Assistant Director General for Technical Cooperation at the FAO. The combination of fluctuating food prices, unpredictable climate patterns – that encourage crop diseases and pests in areas where they were never a threat – water shortage and degradation of soils, have conspired to reduce the prospects for food security for smallholder farmers, especially in the dry areas. Henri  Carsalade, the Chair of ICARDA’s Board of Trustees, emphasized the historical and strategic importance partnership of the CGIAR and FAO to link research with development and the collaboration between FAO and ICARDA is exemplary.

Stronger research for development partnerships
Science and technology are the drivers of increased food security for countries and smallholder communities.  “But this will not happen without stronger research-for- development partnerships that can make scaling up and technology adoption a reality on the ground,” he reiterated.

These partnerships for scaling-up must include a range of country actors – including research, extension and civil society groups; FAO – which convenes and facilitates policy dialogue on food security at the political level, and the CGIAR – the world’s agricultural research for development group, he said.

The current reform of the CGIAR, and the changes progressing at FAO provide an ideal opportunity to intensify this partnership to further link research with development.

ICARDA’s dryland systems approach

Mahmoud Solh

Mahmoud Solh, Director General (ICARDA)

Mahmoud Solh, ICARDA’s Director General set the scene of the current state and challenges for agricultural research in the dry areas and presented the case for why these areas merit the world’s critical attention and investment in research for development.

“Getting agricultural research innovations into use in the dry areas is critically important, especially if we consider that these regions cover 40% of the earth’s surface and are home to 2.5 billion people – a significant percentage of the the world’s population,” he explained.

The estimated benefits of ICARDA’s crop improvement research and production of new varieties over the past three decades has been estimated at $850 million per year.

While these and many other achievements have helped countries improve the livelihoods of many smallholder farmers in dry areas over the past three decades, Solh said that much more intense efforts are needed to get useful technologies into the hands of communities on a wider scale.

Best-best technology and policy packages
As an example of what the future will look like, he explained the approach of the new CGIAR Dryland Systems Research Program referred to as CRP1.1 on Integrated Agricultural Production Systems for Improving Food Security and Livelihoods in Dry Areas – a partnership of several dozen actors, including national research systems and universities, extension agents, civil society organizations, advanced research centers, CGIAR partners, FAO and other development partners. .

“With this program, which is led by ICARDA, we will engage in large-scale action research to identify ‘best-bet’ intervention packages. The program will validate their effectiveness in specific agro-ecosystems, and  promote their scaling-up in dry areas of the West Asia and North Africa, Western Africa and the Dry Savannas, Eastern and Southern Africa, Central and, South Asia” explained Solh. The integrated production packages proposed will combine improved crop varieties, suggestions for diversification to new types of crops, approaches for effective land and water management, disease and pest management, socio-economic considerations and appropriate policy and institutional options.

This ‘systems approach’ takes research-for-development thinking much further than the traditional approaches, he explains. The continual development of new varieties is vital to the world’s future food security, but they need to be delivered in a context that meets the daily reality of smallholder farming communities. “Here we are addressing two agro-ecologies,” explained Solh, “in low-potential dry areas – to improve the resilience of production systems  where farmers are faced with climate unpredictability; andin more favourable dry areas – to  encourage sustainable intensification of these production systems, where possible, to provide farmers with opportunities for crop diversification and  increased  income.”

Shaping a new CGIAR-FAO partnership

Andrea Sonnino

Andrea Sonnino, Chief Research and Extension Branch (FAO)

FAO and the CGIAR have a long history of collaboration, on a range of activities and have agreements with different CGIAR research centers across the developing world.

Andrea Sonnino Chief or the FAO’s Research and Extension Branch sees the current reform of the CGIAR as an opportunity to develop a new level of strategic partnership with FAO, which can link the CGIAR’s research strengths with FAO’s development programmes and strong country relationships. He proposed to develop a roadmap that identifies local needs and priorities in a series of regional and local consultations, that feed into a high-level dialogue. “A new Memorandum of Understanding developed in this way will help sharpen our focus and transform a myriad of individual collaborations between FAO and CGIAR centers into a strategic alliance that can make a long term impact on agricultural development,” he said.

He explained how FAO was a key player in the process of the new CGIAR reform by contributing to the creation of the new CGIAR Research programmes.

The recent external evaluation of FAO recommended that FAO and the CGIAR develop a strong coalition that will make new knowledge available to those who need it in a much more comprehensive way. “A broad consultation is now in progress within FAO, and with our country and regional offices. This will result in a roadmap and action plan for future CGIAR-FAO collaboration based on priority needs identified at national and regional level. We feel that current links are excellent, but we can be more strategic, defining the longer term impact of what we want to achieve with countries”, Sonnino explained.

He also gave examples of current collaboration between the two groups, which includes FAO participation in the new CGIAR research programs on Dryland Systems, Water, Land and Ecosystems, and Climate Change and with CIAT on approaches for women and climate change mitigation in smallholder farming.

Kakoli Ghosh

Kakoli Ghosh, Team Leader of Seeds and Plant Genetic Resources (FAO Plant Production and Protection Division)

Other established activities are the hosting of the CGIAR’s Independent Science Council (ISPC) and the Global Forum for Agricultural Research (GFAR).  Preparations are ongoing for the hosting by FAO of the new CGIAR Independent Evaluation Office by FAO that is currently being established.

The CIARD open access platform for all agricultural information is facilitated by FAO as a joint activity with CGIAR centers and others.

Kakoli Ghosh, FAO’s team leader of Seeds and Plant Genetic Resources in the Plant Production and Protection Division, offered a snapshot of the most intensive areas of FAO-ICARDA collaboration. She highlighted opportunities for future collaboration, which will benefit smallholders and respond to the needs for FAO member countries. These include: analyzing constraints and developing indicators to better understand what is needed to ensure scaling-up of innovations; a partnership to promote seed, cereal and legume production; working together to promote diversification and the use of adapted crop diversity; creation of a platform for participatory technology development with farmers.

Xiangjun Yao, Director Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension (FAO)

Xiangjun Yao, Director of FAO’s Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, who represents FAO in the CGIAR Fund Council emphasized that building a vibrant coalition between FAO and the CGIAR requires a demand-driven consultative process which will consider country programme frameworks and regional priorities to identify focus areas of future collaboration.

This FAO/ICARDA event during the Regional Conference for the Near East can be considered as a first step towards developing a more strategic approach to future collaboration.

Following the consultative process, the preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding between FAO and the CGIAR Consortium Office will provide a framework for a more strategic collaboration which will identify concrete actions for collaboration and impact based on priority needs identified at field level.

 

Useful links:

This update was written by Michael Devlin (ICARDA) and Karin Nichterlein (FAO)
Pictures courtesy ICARDA/FAO/IISD

Where is CGIAR on the road to Rio+20 these days?

There is, of course, the flurry of activity, revolving around CGIAR’s joint presence at Rio+20. Amongst these preparations, we still took time though to participate from 14 until 25 May in the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) held in Bonn (Germany).  SBSTA is an important conference that frames the scientific and technological advice to the Conference of Parties (COP) and the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP).

With agriculture placed on SBSTA’s agenda this year, the CGIAR Research Program for Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) has taken a lead to coordinate CGIAR’s presence at SBSTA, similar to our activities at Planet under Pressure.

CCAFS is reporting live on the week’s activities, in which the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are also participating.

For updates on the latest, read  CCAFS blog for SBSTA.

 

Photo credit: T. Timmermann/CCAFS

Tropical Legumes: boosting yields, improving soil and changing livelihoods

Photo credit: Alina Paul-Bossuet, ICRISAT

High-yielding chickpea varieties have transformed Temegnush Dhabi's farm in East Shewa, Central Ethiopia

 

Whenever Temegnush Dhabi, a 50-year-old widow, stops to look out over her two-hectare farm in East Shewa, Central Ethiopia, she cannot help but think about the dramatic changes that have taken place since 2008.

Until four years ago, Temegnush, who has been a farmer for 26 years, grew mostly teff (a popular cereal native to Ethiopia) on her land. Teff fetches a reasonable price at her local market, but it requires expensive fertilizer to grow well and is labor-intensive to harvest. Then she began working with researchers from the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) to test new improved varieties of chickpea. Pleased with the results from one of the high-yielding, drought-tolerant, pest-resistant varieties, she divided her land in two and started growing chickpeas.

Chickpeas, which are now Temegnush’s main crop, generate more income for her and her family. “I would never have thought chickpeas could bring me such high returns,” she says, scooping out a handful of recently harvested chickpea grains from one of the many bags that fill the grain store in her house. “I started sowing the improved chickpea variety three years ago and it was the best decision I made. Not only do I get better harvests, but it needs very little labor and fertilizer compared to growing cereals.”

Tropical Legumes II (TL-II) project

Temegnush is just one of nearly 250,000 smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia directly reaping the benefits of higher yields and incomes from improved tropical legume varieties and farming practices through the Tropical Legumes II (TL-II) project, which started in 2007. The project has provided farmers in 10 countries with improved varieties of six major grain legumes, as well as much-needed farmer education programs. In Ethiopia alone, the number of farmers growing these new legumes has increased by more than 14 per cent, while in Karnataka, in southwest India, the number has grown by more than 33 per cent since the project began.

“The key driver for this project is that we look at the needs and solutions in a holistic way,” says Tsedeke Abate, TL-II project coordinator. “We work with farmers, agrodealers, market traders and local government to ensure that training and tools, such as high yielding seed varieties, are provided for sustainable impact.”

This “chickpea revolution” shows how agricultural production and productivity can significantly increase when innovations are adapted to farmers’ needs, when local research and extension systems are working, and when all stakeholders work together to meet a healthy market demand.

Other benefits

In addition to helping her test “risk-free” the improved seed varieties, the project also taught Temegnush about crop rotation, how to obtain improved seed and manage her crop. Moreover, in common with other legumes, chickpea boosts nitrogen in the soil, making it more fertile, and reducing the need for fertilizer.

“I started growing wheat on the land after having harvested the chickpea and found that I needed half the amount of fertilizer I used to need to get a good yield of wheat,” she says.

Chickpea is also more water-efficient than teff, which is valuable given the challenges of scarce and unpredictable rainfall in this region.

“The high yields and market value of chickpea last season meant I could buy a second pair of oxen,” says Temegnush. “I lend these to neighboring farmers. I’m no longer seen as a poor widow but a successful farmer. I am also able to send all six of my children to school. So it’s not just my income but also my social status that has improved.”

A second phase of the TL-II project, which is jointly implemented by ICRISAT, the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in close collaboration with partners in the national agricultural research systems of target countries in sub-Saharan Africa and in India, was recently guaranteed by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Further reading: Tropical Legumes II

Photo essay: Ethiopian farmers test new chickpea crops – in pictures

Video impact story: Changing Chickpea Culture in Ethiopia 

Photo credit: Alina Paul-Bossuet, ICRISAT

 

Conservation Agriculture: A Revolution in the Making

After concluding his 40-year career as a mathematics professor, Geraldo Gálvez Orozco began looking for a new challenge and found it in farming. For the last 15 years, this seventy-nine-year-old has been farming in the Mezquital Valley in the mountains of southwest Hidalgo State, 60 kilometers north of Mexico City. Despite the region’s parched soils (the valley receives an average of only 527 mm of rainfall per year), about half the valley’s residents are farmers.

Since 1789, Hidalgo farmers have relied heavily on sewage water, referred to as ‘aguas negras’ or black water, to irrigate their cereal and fodder crops. However, within the next two years, the supply of black water for irrigation will decrease due to a new government initiative to purify Mexico City’s waste-water and reuse it within city limits. Therefore, to maintain the soil on their land, the farmers are switching from traditional agriculture practices to conservation agriculture-based methods.

From arithmetic to agronomy

Gálvez started experimenting with conservation agriculture eight years ago when he adopted the zero-tillage practice and also began leaving his crop residue, such as husks and cobs, on the surface of the ground of his three-hectare farm, where he grows maize and oats.

“Since switching to conservation agriculture, I have noticed a small increase in my yields compared to what I used to produce under irrigation, but I don’t do it for the yields,” he says. “Living in a climate like this, keeping my soils in good condition is my number one priority. That’s why I practice conservation agriculture.”

CIMMYT: Providing the tools to start a revolution

According to Fermín Hernández Méndez, a graduate of CIMMYT’s Conservation Agriculture-certification course and a technician with the Monsanto-ASGROW seed company, Gálvez isn’t the only farmer in the region changing his ways. “In Hidalgo, conservation agriculture is a revolution,” he says.  “Farmers are adopting the practice because they know that a change is coming – a change that is most likely going to strain their soils.”

The work of CIMMYT’s Mexico-based Conservation Agriculture Program in the Mezquital valley, which is helping graduates like Hernández educate farmers on conservation agriculture practices, is funded principally by the Mexican Agricultural Secretariat under the MasAgro initiative and by Monsanto-ASGROW, as well as with support from numerous foundations and local organizations.

Sustainable practices

Conservation agriculture is based on three principles: frequent crop rotation to avoid the build-up of pests and diseases; reduced tillage, so soil is disturbed as little as possible; and covering the soil surface with crop residues and/or living plants. Such principles are widely adaptable and can be used for a variety of different crops in varied soil types and environments.

For example, during the 2009 drought in Mexico’s Central Highlands (where crops rely on precipitation alone), farmers who practiced conservation agriculture harvested up to 125 per cent more maize than those who farmed the traditional way. Combining higher yields with lower costs, conservation agriculture enabled farmers in rain-fed areas to earn an average net return of US$800 per hectare compared to the approximate US$400 per hectare that conventional highland farmers reaped.

A smooth transition

Although the benefits of conservation agriculture are numerous, it faces competition for crop residues, which often have great value as forage. Also, farmers are skeptical about moving away from farming methods that have been used for generations.

Hernández works to help farmers make the transition from the traditional farming methods. “It’s nothing more than a question of culture,” he replies, when asked why some farmers are hesitant to adopt the new principles. “It’s not that they don’t believe us or think we mean ill, it’s simply that they are afraid of change.”

The future

“I’m not worried for myself, I have all I need,” says Gálvez, as he crunches through the corn husks and stalks that blanket his fields. ”I am worried for my children. The land needs to stay healthy and fertile for the future generations.”

Read the full story Aguas negras: An agricultural revolutions buds in Mexico

Learn more about CIMMYT’s Conservation Agriculture Program

Video credit: CIMMYT

Scuba rice: the makings of a runaway success story

Basant Kumar Rao, a rice farmer from Orissa, India, stands in his crop of Swarna-Sub1, which recovered well after two floods hit his farm in 2007

 

“Forget Swarna! Go for Swarna-Sub1!” is the advice of Basant Kumar Rao, a rice farmer who took part in trials of a new variety of flood-tolerant rice on his farm in India’s coastal state of Orissa. “I trust Swarna-Sub1. I’ll keep growing it. I got good money for it in 2007,” he says.

In 2007, two floods hit Basant’s farm. One lasted 11 days, and the other seven days. The Swarna-Sub1 rice, a flood-tolerant version of the widely grown Swarna rice variety, recovered well after both floods. Although he was able to salvage a little of his regular Swarna crop, it yielded nowhere near as much.

“Better yielding is better living,” says another Orissa farmer, Bidhu Bhusan Raut. During the 2008 wet season, Bidhu grew both Gayatri (a popular Indian variety of rice) and Swarna-Sub1 on his entire one-hectare farm. After a 10-day flood, the Sub1 plants recovered well, while the Gayatri plants perished.

Similar trial successes have been recorded in Bangladesh.

Fighting the floods

Every year, four million tons of rice are wiped out by floods in India and Bangladesh. Devastated farmers cannot do anything to prevent the rains from coming, but by adopting Warna-Sub1, it is expected that they will be able to grow enough extra rice to feed 30 million people. In India alone, farmers responsible for 12 million hectares of land in flood-prone areas are planting the scuba rice at unprecedented rates, thanks to faster seed multiplication, targeted dissemination, and the linking of partners.

“Swarna-Sub1 incorporates the SUB1 gene into the Indian mega-variety Swarna, making it resilient to flooding of up to 17 days while retaining the desirable traits of the original variety,“ said Dr. David Mackill, senior scientist at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), who identified the SUB1 gene and developed Sub1 varieties.

Multiplying and distributing

Dr. Umesh Singh, an IRRI senior scientist, said, “Earlier, we only provided and field-tested IRRI rice lines that were tolerant of flooding. Now, we assist government agencies and private seed companies to multiply and distribute seeds to farmers at a faster pace.”

Field-testing a rice variety normally takes four to five years before it is released and another two to three years before it reaches farmers. Through targeted dissemination, IRRI is helping state governments in India to identify specific flood-prone areas where seeds of the submergence-tolerant variety can be distributed, without having to wait until it is multiplied and distributed en masse. The Center is leading this initiative through the Stress-Tolerant Rice for Poor Farmers in Africa and South Asia project, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To date, 70,000 IRRI minikits (5kg packets of seeds) have been distributed to more than 100,000 farmers. Dr. Singh feels that the flood-tolerant rice could entirely replace Swarna and spread to other flood-prone areas in the country.

“Swarna-Sub1, which was released in August 2009, is the first submergence-tolerant, high-yielding rice variety in India,” says Dr. Singh. “It was released in record time and is spreading at an unprecedented speed.”

Photo credit: Adam Barclay CPS, IRRI

Further reading:
Rice Today: Scuba rice–stemming the tide in flood-prone South Asia

Stress-Tolerant Rice for Poor Farmers in Africa and South Asia (STRASA)
Photos: Submergence-tolerant rice
Video: Time-lapse video of submergence-tolerant rice

 

Winning the Battle Against Deadly Wheat Fungus

Photo credit: Thomas Lumpkin, CIMMYT

Wheat leaf infected with stripe rust, also known as yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis)

 

When stripe rust disease  strikes a susceptible wheat crop, the results are usually devastating. The fungus can spread like wildfire, quickly transforming fields of healthy wheat into yellow swathes of stunted grain. The disease results in fewer spikes, fewer grains per spike, and shriveled grains with reduced weight.

“You see very beautiful fields actually, yellow like a canola field in flower,” says Firdissa Eticha, the national wheat research program coordinator with the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR). “But for farmers, it is a very sad sight. Stripe rust can cause up to 100% yield loss.”

And Eticha should know. Ethiopia’s wheat crops became of one the casualties in the race against the disease in 2010, when a severe stripe rust epidemic struck the country, hitting many dominant wheat varieties. This threat was further compounded by climate change, with persistent gentle rains throughout the year, and prolonged dews and cool temperatures – perfect weather for stripe rust. There was little Ethiopia could do to prevent the epidemic. Imported fungicides controlled the disease when they were applied on time, but supplies were limited and expensive.

But Ethiopia was not alone. Many countries in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, struggled to control the epidemic in 2009 and 2010. But even more alarming was the evolution of new races of stripe rust that are able to overcome a major wheat gene (Yr27) that was previously resistant to the disease.

CIMMYT’s Global Wheat Program

Although recent weather conditions have allowed the new rust races to thrive, the fungus first began to emerge more than a decade ago. As a result, CIMMYT’s Global Wheat Program, which tries to anticipate the next stripe rust threat, began selection for resistance to Yr27-virulent races in 1998.

“CIMMYT has a number of wheat lines that have shown good-to-excellent resistance to stripe rust without relying on Yr27, in screening in Mexico, Ecuador, and Kenya,” says Ravi Singh, a CIMMYT scientist and rust expert who leads the breeding effort in Mexico.

Seed multiplication of resistant CIMMYT varieties

Currently, CIMMYT is working with national programs to identify and promote the best resistant materials for individual environments — a process that was underway in Ethiopia when the epidemic struck. Indeed, newly released wheat varieties derived from international partnerships have proven to be resistant to the disease, and are now being multiplied for seed. In particular, two CIMMYT lines released in Ethiopia in 2010 have shown to be both high yielding and resistant to stripe rust in their target environments.

EIAR and the Ethiopian Seed Enterprise, a government company specializing in providing select seed, worked together to speed the multiplication of seed of these varieties, with financial support from the USAID Famine Fund. Two resistant lines from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) were released in Ethiopia in 2011, and will add to the diversity for resistance.

Nine hundred farmers grew the new varieties on small on-farm demonstration plots in 2010, resulting in disease-resistant crops. More demonstration plots will be made available as more seed becomes available.

The importance of partnership

“The contribution of CIMMYT is immense for us,” says Eticha. “CIMMYT provides us with a wide range of germplasm that is almost finished technology — one can say ready materials that can be evaluated and released as varieties that can be used by farming communities.”

Bekele Abeyo, a CIMMYT senior scientist who works closely with national programs in Ethiopia, also emphasized the importance of partnership. “I think East Africa is colonized by rust,” he says. “Unless national programs work hard to overcome and contain disease pressure, wheat production is under great threat. It is very important that we continue to strengthen the national programs to overcome the rust problem in the region.”

With Yr27-virulent stripe rust varieties now widespread throughout the world, Ethiopia’s story is reflected in many CIMMYT partner countries. The challenge is to work quickly together to identify and replace susceptible varieties with the new, productive, resistant materials.

Read the full story: Resistant wheats and Ethiopian farmers battle deadly fungus
Find out more about CIMMYT’s Global Wheat Program

Photo credit: Thomas Lumpkin, CIMMYT

Improved potato varieties ensure Peruvian communities have enough to eat

Peruvian potato farmers.  Photo S. De Haan (CIP)

Peruvian potato farmers. Photo S. De Haan (CIP)

Excessive rains and the increased presence of late blight disease devastated Peru’s Cusco region in 2010, prompting the government to declare a national emergency. The following season, the food security of communities in the region’s Paucartambo province was maintained due in part to two improved potato varieties developed by the International Potato Center (CIP).

The Pallay Poncho and Puka Lliclla varieties are both resistant to late blight disease, a fungus that is posing an increasing threat to potato production in the Andes.

“Three years after their formal release, the yield of these two potato [varieties] was about 8 times higher than any of the 150 native potato varieties grown in the Cusco region,” explains Stef de Haan, CIP potato breeder, adding “It made the difference between having enough to eat, or not.”

Pallay Poncho and Puka Lliclla give yields of approximately 15-16 tons per hectare, compared to 5 tons per hectare from traditional native potatoes. Following the floods of 2010, yields from the improved varieties were maintained, while traditional varieties produced yields of about 2 tons per hectare, due to late blight damage.

Looking back

Back in 2003, CIP joined forces with the Peruvian Ministry of Agriculture and Peru’s National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (INIA) after late blight wiped out the native potato harvest of a large farming community in Paucartambo. It was the first time that the disease had occurred at such a high altitude.

“The rise in temperature due to climate change makes formerly untouched areas fall victim to the potatoes most feared disease, late blight, which is causing more damage with each year,” says CIP agronomist, Manuel Gastelo.

The improved varieties were chosen through a participatory selection process involving 200 farming families in the affected area working with 20 Andigena clones with expected late blight resistance. After 5 years of testing, the two clones with the best properties and performance, Pallay Poncho and Puka Lliclla, were chosen in collaboration with the community.

Today, small-scale Andean farmers, averse to risk, grow the two varieties along with numerous native varieties.  The improved varieties have not replaced local ones. Instead, they are used as a sort of insurance in case traditional varieties are damaged by disease.

Short-term gains

While this example is notable, it is not unique. Investment in the breeding of improved varieties is showing huge payoffs all over the world. A recent CIP study analyzing survey data from 23 national potato breeding programs in developing countries showed a rate of return on investment of approximately 20 per cent. The study also found that more than one million hectares of land in developing countries had been planted with CIP-linked varieties, with most of the benefits accruing to poor producers and consumers.

However, the trend toward lower investment in long-term global research initiatives, such as breeding, is threatening to compromise such advances. Likewise, pressures from donors to produce short-term results for targeted programs are moving investment away from upstream research spanning several years, even when it has the potential to produce the biggest impact in the longer run.

Further reading: International Potato Center Annual Report 2007 (page 14)
Download Flyer: New potato varieties prove vital for the survival of mountain communities
Photo credit: S. De Haan, International Potato Center